Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: »7170 managers in Sokker!
this is a game guys. no need to upset anyone. we are having fun here. have fun everybody
Countries with the most teams that should be deleted ("bots" column):
I have no problem with you friend :)
Simply when I wrote time that there are 7500 active users, you replied that I write false things.
Simply when I wrote time that there are 7500 active users, you replied that I write false things.
Thanks @Mikoos
I can expect that most "plus" are not inactive (6k users) and 10% users could be "plus" —probably an overestimation — so let's say 600 "plus" users.
Well, it should cover technical costs (servers...) at least, but zero full-time job.
(edited)
I can expect that most "plus" are not inactive (6k users) and 10% users could be "plus" —probably an overestimation — so let's say 600 "plus" users.
Well, it should cover technical costs (servers...) at least, but zero full-time job.
(edited)
since this is the core users that do not give up no matter all maybe 20% plus im so optimistic :) we can remove pluses to mods and admins buy replacing their duties with automation :)
mods and admins that did a great job in few countries, according to bots_percent :-p
edit : well in those countries there s usually no admin/mods, so...
(edited)
edit : well in those countries there s usually no admin/mods, so...
(edited)
I continue to buy plus. But the only reason is that I like the game. I would like to clearly say that the devs do not give the necessary value to this game and I do not believe in them. Among the developers, only kryminator values us and answers questions, but unfortunately he understands us to a certain extent because he doesn't know everything.
the performance of devs will not denay me to buy one year plus but i will still complain :)
So you feel the need to compensate your complaining with plus payment? :-p
Hahaha
the performance of devs will not denay me to buy one year plus but i will still complain :)
the performance of devs will not denay me to buy one year plus but i will still complain :)
Thanks @Mikoos
You're welcome
I can expect that most "plus" are not inactive (6k users) and 10% users could be "plus" —probably an overestimation — so let's say 600 "plus" users.
Strong underestimation
There are 1573 plus users (trial pluses are NOT counted here), out of them 1479 plus members that aren't staff members (=paid plus).
You're welcome
I can expect that most "plus" are not inactive (6k users) and 10% users could be "plus" —probably an overestimation — so let's say 600 "plus" users.
Strong underestimation
There are 1573 plus users (trial pluses are NOT counted here), out of them 1479 plus members that aren't staff members (=paid plus).
was 12% iirc, years ago when I did checked and number of users was 10-15k
edit: 7% in times of 34k and 12% in times of 13k users
(edited)
edit: 7% in times of 34k and 12% in times of 13k users
(edited)
1479. Not bad for someone who don't gather data about plus users :-p
Thats 1 plus user for 4 active users, very impressive and ... very surprising.
it's a membership percentage that's apparently been rising for years, while the number of users has been falling. I'd tend to think that all that's left is a loyal base.
But I'm surprised that this base continues to pay when the game offers even less scope for improvement. A previous above comment by @iyi insan olmak could be an explanation : he "continue to buy plus" because he "like the game", despite the fact he "do not believe" in devs. Something tells me it won't be sustainable over time :-)
(edited)
Thats 1 plus user for 4 active users, very impressive and ... very surprising.
it's a membership percentage that's apparently been rising for years, while the number of users has been falling. I'd tend to think that all that's left is a loyal base.
But I'm surprised that this base continues to pay when the game offers even less scope for improvement. A previous above comment by @iyi insan olmak could be an explanation : he "continue to buy plus" because he "like the game", despite the fact he "do not believe" in devs. Something tells me it won't be sustainable over time :-)
(edited)