Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: »Champions Cup
We have a saying in Croatia: "With gentleman - like gentleman, with bandit - like bandit" ;)
I went a few times to check matches of Polish Ekstraklasa and then gave up when I saw that it should be renamed to Extradefault.
I went a few times to check matches of Polish Ekstraklasa and then gave up when I saw that it should be renamed to Extradefault.
but I think that nobody deserved this trophy this season more then him
Agree. I think everytime when I was looking what teams remained in quarterfinals/semifinals, he was always there :)
Congrats, Kuksa, congrats, Gaudin :)
(edited)
Agree. I think everytime when I was looking what teams remained in quarterfinals/semifinals, he was always there :)
Congrats, Kuksa, congrats, Gaudin :)
(edited)
It's true, but it's not the point though. No one gave our CC members any walkover or easy game just because they played in CC. If they got it, they got it because the other team decided that walkover is best for their team/they sold out their whole team.
In Your case there was a walkover in 1/16 of National Cup...it's not the same, right? :)
In Your case there was a walkover in 1/16 of National Cup...it's not the same, right? :)
Working on an interview with Kuksa. Should be front page news if I can help it.
You had a good point.
What happened in the last Kuksa's Cup match was a disgrace. Kuksa decided to send his second team, it's nothing wrong with it, it's justifiable by the CCC final presence, but the other team played corner tactic just to help Kuksa's qualification, it sounds like a fixed match, unfortunately.
That's why I ever was against the similar facts in Polish side: lack of fair-play brings other lack of fair-play reactions, sooner or later.
Otherwise, congrats for the two finalists, and for the great performance of the winner.
What happened in the last Kuksa's Cup match was a disgrace. Kuksa decided to send his second team, it's nothing wrong with it, it's justifiable by the CCC final presence, but the other team played corner tactic just to help Kuksa's qualification, it sounds like a fixed match, unfortunately.
That's why I ever was against the similar facts in Polish side: lack of fair-play brings other lack of fair-play reactions, sooner or later.
Otherwise, congrats for the two finalists, and for the great performance of the winner.
Well, from what I know, Kuksa was ready to sacrifice cup this season but his opponent decided that it would be unfair to win in a match just because better team is not interested into it. Quite a ridiculous situation imo but definitelly shouldn't be marked as a fixed match.
(edited)
(edited)
his opponent decided that it would be unfair to win in a match just because better team is not interested into it.
so he decided to lose :P
it sounds so ridiculous :)
so he decided to lose :P
it sounds so ridiculous :)
Hopefully, his next cup opponent won't be so forgiving
