Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: »[U21] World Cup Qualifiers
It is having an effect on you... otherwise you would ignore my posts like you said 2 hours ago you would
Another one that has been affected by my opinion...
so affected that had to write this sk-mail to me:
Message from: Wo-10 To: panchoahead
Date of posting: 2012-08-24 22:31
Subject: (žádný předmět)
Hi,
Enough! Stop spam Czech forum. Nobody cares and there's just annoying. I think that's your thing and do not tackle it with us.
Thanks, hopefully you understand.
Unfortunatelly as I told you through sk-mail, you'll have to cop with my opinion... I dont see why I cant express it whenever a forum member argues about something I said.
As you have the right to put whatever player you want against Canada, I have the right to express my opinion as an answer to every post that argues against it.
(edited)
so affected that had to write this sk-mail to me:
Message from: Wo-10 To: panchoahead
Date of posting: 2012-08-24 22:31
Subject: (žádný předmět)
Hi,
Enough! Stop spam Czech forum. Nobody cares and there's just annoying. I think that's your thing and do not tackle it with us.
Thanks, hopefully you understand.
Unfortunatelly as I told you through sk-mail, you'll have to cop with my opinion... I dont see why I cant express it whenever a forum member argues about something I said.
As you have the right to put whatever player you want against Canada, I have the right to express my opinion as an answer to every post that argues against it.
(edited)
HERE you are spamming ... but not worth to talk with someone .. who behaves as 5 year-old child.
I don't see what the problem is here? If one of your opponents top players has an injury or a suspension, then you have an unfair advantage over the other teams who had to play against that top player. The way the matches are planned gives you a disadvantage, well, that's part of the game. And I agree that this is a kind of bad luck that is controllable, but there is no way you can be mad at the czech coach for not selecting his best team. He has done well in the past and the reward is that he can let the better players rest.
just look at my posts... they are all different from one another... not spamming at all...
Let any MOD tell you if that is spam. I am 100% sure it is not.
Saying what you think to every forum member that argues against your post is not spam... those forum members shouldnt keep posting if they dont want an answer... So perhaps you shouldnt keep posting here if you dont want to read me, and stop writing sk-mails if what I say doesnt affect you.
Let any MOD tell you if that is spam. I am 100% sure it is not.
Saying what you think to every forum member that argues against your post is not spam... those forum members shouldnt keep posting if they dont want an answer... So perhaps you shouldnt keep posting here if you dont want to read me, and stop writing sk-mails if what I say doesnt affect you.
There is no problema at all.
The czechs used a right they have to play with u20 players, and I use a right I have to protest about that. Is there something wrong with protesting against what I believe is unfair treatment?
The czechs used a right they have to play with u20 players, and I use a right I have to protest about that. Is there something wrong with protesting against what I believe is unfair treatment?
It's annoying. And what do you hope to achieve here?
but Czech win :D ... this is problem, but your :D
I dont care it annoys anybody... its my opinion... as czech coach doesnt care playing u20 against one team and u21 against another... its his right even if it annoys me... its my right to protest even if it annoys you.
What I want to achieve is to show everybody what they can expect from these people if they face a situation like mine.
If your team depends on my fair play, be sure I'll do my best to win, no matter if I have the right do play with u16 players... if your team depends on the czechs, I am sorry for you.
(edited)
What I want to achieve is to show everybody what they can expect from these people if they face a situation like mine.
If your team depends on my fair play, be sure I'll do my best to win, no matter if I have the right do play with u16 players... if your team depends on the czechs, I am sorry for you.
(edited)
Ok, so if 2 managers asked you to not use their players because of important matches and the match does not really matter to you, you will still let them play, because it would be unfair to one of you opponent opponents?
If I let the best Belgian players rest for a match against Iran a few seasons ago, then I'm a bad person because it's unfair to the direct opponent of Iran? Face it, your discussion is useless and unnecessary.
If I let the best Belgian players rest for a match against Iran a few seasons ago, then I'm a bad person because it's unfair to the direct opponent of Iran? Face it, your discussion is useless and unnecessary.
when you get fired am going to take your nt job
In the Olympic Games several badmington players were fired because they tried to loose to avoid facing a rival in the playoffs. There was no proof... just judgement. And they were fired anyway.
They were intentionally losing a match. That's something completely different. Don't compare apples with oranges. Just a few real life examples from Euro 2008:
- Portugal, qualified for qf after 2 games, fielded B-team in the 3rd game and lost. They should have been fired?
- Croatia, same story, fielded B-team in the 3rd game and won. They should have been fired?
- Spain, same story, also B-team, also won. So?
Those strories happen everyday. Czechs shouldn't profit from their good performance (and testing their WC squad) only because you weren't able to pick up the necessary points in the matches against direct opponents? Sorry, no understanding for that and imho no reason to make such a big noise here.
They were intentionally losing a match. That's something completely different. Don't compare apples with oranges. Just a few real life examples from Euro 2008:
- Portugal, qualified for qf after 2 games, fielded B-team in the 3rd game and lost. They should have been fired?
- Croatia, same story, fielded B-team in the 3rd game and won. They should have been fired?
- Spain, same story, also B-team, also won. So?
Those strories happen everyday. Czechs shouldn't profit from their good performance (and testing their WC squad) only because you weren't able to pick up the necessary points in the matches against direct opponents? Sorry, no understanding for that and imho no reason to make such a big noise here.
I never accept withdrawing players because managers need them, exept in the league qualification
I believe NT is above any individual team, so yes: I would put all the players.
BTW: I am not meaning you always have to play with the same squad... just that you should always do the best to win... and this was not the case.
I believe NT is above any individual team, so yes: I would put all the players.
BTW: I am not meaning you always have to play with the same squad... just that you should always do the best to win... and this was not the case.
Fairness doesnt have anything to do with rules and rights.
In this case I said several times that the czechs have the right to put the players they want. But that is unfair with Uruguay and India. Fullstop.
There is little to argue about it. Its clearly unfair, and I can protest about it as many times that I want.
In this case I said several times that the czechs have the right to put the players they want. But that is unfair with Uruguay and India. Fullstop.
There is little to argue about it. Its clearly unfair, and I can protest about it as many times that I want.