Azərbaycan dili Bahasa Indonesia Bosanski Català Čeština Dansk Deutsch Eesti English Español Français Galego Hrvatski Italiano Latviešu Lietuvių Magyar Malti Mакедонски Nederlands Norsk Polski Português Português BR Românã Slovenčina Srpski Suomi Svenska Tiếng Việt Türkçe Ελληνικά Български Русский Українська Հայերեն ქართული ენა 中文
Subpage under development, new version coming soon!

Subject: [Addon]SkUnk

2020-05-07 10:52:47
League statistics... I have plus and I never checked this option.

I just did it for you.. A grey bar appeared and loaded in green colour, then disappeared and then nothing...
I suggest nothing happened, because I have plus.


(edited)
2020-05-07 13:04:19
Today somehow everything stopped to work for me. I even tried to overwrite the skunk files with the https version and nothing changed...
2020-05-07 13:45:05
did you tried newest 2020.2 version?
what browser? what version? what layout?
2020-05-07 14:11:37
at new version of Firefox,skunk working fine again,ty Krymi!
I think we need to download it again and drag n drop it to the browser.
(edited)
2020-05-07 14:52:31
Yep its the Version 2020.2
Browser: Opera 68
New layout

I used the file from first post to reinstall it: https://www.dropbox.com/s/l4u6nytqkhgwcd7/skunk.crx?dl=1
Then as it did not help i overwrote the files with the contents of: https://gofile.io/?c=2sPhCd

So what did my lazy ass do wrong? :D
2020-05-07 15:21:47
hmm, I tested such setup yesterday

You open opera:extensions page, move the crx file on it, it is added but not installed because it is not from store, so You switch on install and then it should work, although I see that native extension options do not work (or I am too stupid to open them), but except that it work (at least for me)

the options though should be accessible via chrome-extension://mhlcpjkogdlmabpgifdbjignalmeiomm/options.html
2020-05-07 15:48:42
ok, something weird must have happened, when i opened the options i got some error about duplicated settings.
I removed the plugin and put it back again and it works :-)

Thanx
2020-05-07 20:12:52
Guys, I am going to make the $ icon work again, the player price estimation functionality. I think that this webpage will be able to fulfill that functionality: https://www.sokker-manager.net/Transfers/Index

However, from what I see, it works slightly different than the previous webpage worldofbarter which was able to show me similar transfers to given player basing on some calculated "similarity grade". Here there is no such thing but we are able to set borders lowest and highest. And I am thinking about +/- 2 by default but maybe with additional dialog window to change the number to 3 or 1 for example.

What do You think the number should be?
2020-05-07 20:22:21
Tks Very Much!
It's working in Firefox :D
2020-05-07 20:26:47
yes was about to write you for https://www.sokker-manager.net/Transfers/Index but forgot great idea !
2020-05-07 20:27:36
You can do it +-2 i think
(edited)
2020-05-07 20:32:51
but what do you think about the details
- should stamina be included like other skills and age?
- should age min/max be like skills min/max
- should min/max be always +/- 2 as I suggested or maybe +/- 3 or +/- 1?
- if min/max could vary then configurable in options or small dialog box after clicking the $ icon with a number to select

I am now thinking about default +/- 2 or 3 and small dialog to change it before sending request. + including stamina and age +/- like the skills.
2020-05-07 20:36:18
also I am not going to include form and height and maybe I will also exclude stamina

problematic example from my own team:
Benedykt Zoliborz, age:29
club: Wściekłe Pięści Węża, country: Polska
value: 2 492 750 $, wage: 33 350 $
excellent [10] form, brilliant [14] tactical discipline
height: 175 cm, weight: 76 kg, BMI: 24.82

solid [8] stamina, hopeless [1] keeper
unearthly [16] pace, unearthly [16] defender
divine [17] technique, outstanding [12] playmaker
divine [17] passing, formidable [11] striker

If it would be 2 and stamina included then stamina 11 is excluded from request which is not good imo
Also, the striker value in this case seems problematic, because it will be generally like looking for def-mids with striker 9-13 which is pretty high value for that kind of position
2020-05-07 20:42:07
IMO
- should stamina be included like other skills and age? no
- should age min/max be like skills min/max age is important especially in the begining of season = will be good
- should min/max be always +/- 2 as I suggested or maybe +/- 3 or +/- 1? +-2 is ok i think
- if min/max could vary then configurable in options or small dialog box after clicking the $ icon with a number to select will be cool but if complex leave it
the tool after allows you to play with selections so no matter how you will do it will be perfect
2020-05-07 20:50:30
but what do you think about the details

I thinnk it´s more important to get result only from the past year (past 3,2 seasons), because transfer market prices raise every season...

Even if you recall from Ramonymous site players from just 1 year, then +/-1 should be enough to have some results.
2020-05-07 20:51:05
+1