Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: NEWS Sokker- big changes are coming!
There should be a feature, like an option to hire an expensive nutritionist for a player, to reduce his potential injuries. It would be a nice way to protect the most important players.
+0.5
This is sk and not real life. But the idea is to make sk as real as posibble but also simple.
I agree that long injuries should be reduced, but I am not sure about médica stuffs.... Just reduce the time to max 12 days, then the player wont lose the training.
Also could improve some things... For example, the Week that a player players with his NT, could get more attendance to the club or the NT could pay 10% of his salary, just small things. Having a NT player after 26yo is a headeache
This is sk and not real life. But the idea is to make sk as real as posibble but also simple.
I agree that long injuries should be reduced, but I am not sure about médica stuffs.... Just reduce the time to max 12 days, then the player wont lose the training.
Also could improve some things... For example, the Week that a player players with his NT, could get more attendance to the club or the NT could pay 10% of his salary, just small things. Having a NT player after 26yo is a headeache
Remove the ball also, it is more fun to see the players running on the pitch after.... nothing...
Haha +1 a football MANAGER without injuries and cards would be a crap. It wouldn't be a football manager, it would be all like a demo (no football, another different sport) and best teams would always win. I don't understand what would be the fun of this.
And I'm one of the hardest hit by injuries, I think it should be adjusted, but Devs said they will do, so we only have to wait.
(edited)
Haha +1 a football MANAGER without injuries and cards would be a crap. It wouldn't be a football manager, it would be all like a demo (no football, another different sport) and best teams would always win. I don't understand what would be the fun of this.
And I'm one of the hardest hit by injuries, I think it should be adjusted, but Devs said they will do, so we only have to wait.
(edited)
Ok, thank you Sviktorov, now it's obvious enough.
And I will not debate anymore here about injuries - I share the same opinion with Rapelo, other people have different opinions and I can live with it.
(edited)
I imagine football without injuries and cards and I imagine a different sport, something like demo wrestling football.
However, injuries and cards should be improved. Injuries will be fixed according to Devs (they will be reduced and maybe some protection when you have many players injured), but I didn't hear anything about cards and it would be interesting to have more logical cards depending on the match situation.
(edited)
However, injuries and cards should be improved. Injuries will be fixed according to Devs (they will be reduced and maybe some protection when you have many players injured), but I didn't hear anything about cards and it would be interesting to have more logical cards depending on the match situation.
(edited)
The best thing in sokker is tactical editor .
All random elements do need improvement and less random better. Injuries basically ruin the hard work you do . You cannot predict them so how actually managers can compensate them. Wild trading no thanks . At least they need to be reduced to acceptable level to not ruin second best thing about sokker training..
And last removing NT injuries is not an option if they exist in general but money competition to owner
Ps : tsolias do you really believe I actually insist to not have injuries in the game obviously that will never happened but I really hate them and for me 9 injuries in 6 games most major on training positions was nightmare so do not wish it to anyone ..
All random elements do need improvement and less random better. Injuries basically ruin the hard work you do . You cannot predict them so how actually managers can compensate them. Wild trading no thanks . At least they need to be reduced to acceptable level to not ruin second best thing about sokker training..
And last removing NT injuries is not an option if they exist in general but money competition to owner
Ps : tsolias do you really believe I actually insist to not have injuries in the game obviously that will never happened but I really hate them and for me 9 injuries in 6 games most major on training positions was nightmare so do not wish it to anyone ..
Yes, it's frustrating, I have the same problem for several seasons and seeing how other users rarely have injuries.
We need to wait to changes.
Anyway random things are good, they are necessary, if not it would be too boring. I like sokker because a weak team can sometimes win a strong team. Sometimes luck decides like in real life. Not only tactics should decide a match, it would be too boring. Football is football and many factors can play and that is the fun thing, this is not chess game, and even in chess you can have a bad day...
(edited)
We need to wait to changes.
Anyway random things are good, they are necessary, if not it would be too boring. I like sokker because a weak team can sometimes win a strong team. Sometimes luck decides like in real life. Not only tactics should decide a match, it would be too boring. Football is football and many factors can play and that is the fun thing, this is not chess game, and even in chess you can have a bad day...
(edited)
And last removing NT injuries is not an option if they exist in general but money competition to owner
What?
I haven't heard a good reason to keep NT injuries, so I am really interested in what you are trying to say. I really struggle to understand why are you guys against removing NT injuries, but I hope that devs can see how injuries caused by another user can ruin someones experience here.
What?
I haven't heard a good reason to keep NT injuries, so I am really interested in what you are trying to say. I really struggle to understand why are you guys against removing NT injuries, but I hope that devs can see how injuries caused by another user can ruin someones experience here.
im not against but they wont ... and if they remove them from NT would not that be unrealistic ?
so im suggesting paying compensation from "federation" for medical treatment and fast recovery of the player ..
so im suggesting paying compensation from "federation" for medical treatment and fast recovery of the player ..
never said remove all gain from NT matches, XP bonus stays, and maybe a little training bonus.
And the point of NT is having NT :), bonus training is just an extra feature.
You just want the gain, but not the pain...
If injuries are removed you shouldn't have any gain (experience nor training), therefore there would be no point for NT teams from small nations because nobody would like to train weak players without the training bonus.
You could have NT just for having them, but there would be no players to use.
And the point of NT is having NT :), bonus training is just an extra feature.
You just want the gain, but not the pain...
If injuries are removed you shouldn't have any gain (experience nor training), therefore there would be no point for NT teams from small nations because nobody would like to train weak players without the training bonus.
You could have NT just for having them, but there would be no players to use.
If injuries are removed you shouldn't have any gain (experience nor training)
Why?
And do you train bad talents just because they play U21 matches for a season or something?
Why?
And do you train bad talents just because they play U21 matches for a season or something?
NT games must help to improve players and also have the risk of injuries, that’s the counterpart...
Transfer rules like a shit.Why we need to wait one month for sell a player. Game owners dont look to transfer list? Not enough good players on tl and some good players are so expensive. This game going to die so fast.
I think this rule is great.
There were users, who made 100m euros per season from daytrading, which is so unfair compared with players, who do not use special programs for price adjustments.
Now just look at this like that: if you sign a contract with a player, you are commited to have him in the team for at least 1 month and it is not a players fault if he got injury on your team or something like that. He wants his contract, he wants his money and you commited to give it to him. It is your commitment and you have to be careful if you really want the player on your team.
(edited)
There were users, who made 100m euros per season from daytrading, which is so unfair compared with players, who do not use special programs for price adjustments.
Now just look at this like that: if you sign a contract with a player, you are commited to have him in the team for at least 1 month and it is not a players fault if he got injury on your team or something like that. He wants his contract, he wants his money and you commited to give it to him. It is your commitment and you have to be careful if you really want the player on your team.
(edited)
If injuries are removed you shouldn't have any gain (experience nor training)
Why?
because you have to balance the "gains" somehow, bearing in mind that the amount of user with NT players is limited (really small number); if not, that would led to a brutal advantage not by competence (better game managing), but by a terrible bias.
And do you train bad talents just because they play U21 matches for a season or something?
In some countries it is exactly like that because there are no enough players to discriminate between talented or not. Any player aged 16-17 is potentially an U21 NT player.
Again, I reckon for senior NT is a little bit different... but the solution (no injuries), I think it's worse than the current situation.
(edited)
Why?
because you have to balance the "gains" somehow, bearing in mind that the amount of user with NT players is limited (really small number); if not, that would led to a brutal advantage not by competence (better game managing), but by a terrible bias.
And do you train bad talents just because they play U21 matches for a season or something?
In some countries it is exactly like that because there are no enough players to discriminate between talented or not. Any player aged 16-17 is potentially an U21 NT player.
Again, I reckon for senior NT is a little bit different... but the solution (no injuries), I think it's worse than the current situation.
(edited)
because you have to balance the "gains" somehow, bearing in mind that the amount of user with NT players is limited (really small number); if not, that would led to a brutal advantage not by competence (better game managing), but by a terrible bias.
Is it balanced now? Training and XP gain vs injuries? Is is good or bad that your player player for U21 NT, or is it balanced?
Is it balanced now? Training and XP gain vs injuries? Is is good or bad that your player player for U21 NT, or is it balanced?