Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: Bargain / Robbed topic 2.0
Normal, but maybe slightly robbed in the end of the season.
Bought similar one for 250k this weekend.
Bought similar one for 250k this weekend.
bro i saw player 16y
6 6 6 left and 4 5 2 right skills for 8,2mil euros
600-700k not R at all :)
(edited)
6 6 6 left and 4 5 2 right skills for 8,2mil euros
600-700k not R at all :)
(edited)
600k euro
B o R ?
Age 16
Hopeless stamina hopeless keeper
Weak pace adequate defance
unsatisfactory tecnique average playmaker
Average passing hopeless striker
B o R ?
Age 16
Hopeless stamina hopeless keeper
Weak pace adequate defance
unsatisfactory tecnique average playmaker
Average passing hopeless striker
Thanks. I got a little bored and decided to sell my all players. I will take and train young players. I transferred for testing purposes. Greetings.
I am Just telling reality.....
250k, bought this weekend:
Norbert Murańka, age: 16, height: 178 cm
value: 38 250 €, wage: 525 €
club: HFC Haarlem, country: Polska
excellent form, tragic tactical discipline
poor stamina, tragic keeper
good pace, average defender
poor technique, average playmaker
poor passing, hopeless striker
(edited)
250k, bought this weekend:
Norbert Murańka, age: 16, height: 178 cm
value: 38 250 €, wage: 525 €
club: HFC Haarlem, country: Polska
excellent form, tragic tactical discipline
poor stamina, tragic keeper
good pace, average defender
poor technique, average playmaker
poor passing, hopeless striker
(edited)
I was about to buy that player around Norbert's price but then 2 other bidders came and I had to increase price to get him. Norbert is bargain for sure, congratz
If Muranka was really talented he wouldn't have been on TL... He is trained in a team for 5 weeks... So on skils it's a superb price. But there is a possibility not a lot of profit will be made with him. It explanes the low price for sure.
(edited)
(edited)
Yeah, Murańka was 3 weeks to good pace, so average talent at best
3 weeks to good pace can be good and average/bad. Other 16 year pull can have very bad talent... he has very small chance to have very good talent.
So no, I dont share your opinion.
Yes, i did receive the screen of this talent also (before deadline).
In the past I had another player with youth talent 3.5 that did pop in 3 weeks to good pace at 16y.
Only thing you can tell is that he does not have very good talent and he does not have very bad talent also.
(edited)
So no, I dont share your opinion.
Yes, i did receive the screen of this talent also (before deadline).
In the past I had another player with youth talent 3.5 that did pop in 3 weeks to good pace at 16y.
Only thing you can tell is that he does not have very good talent and he does not have very bad talent also.
(edited)
3 weeks to good pace at 16 y not good talent . just average ...
Read the rest of my post ( edit), he might have talent 3.5 in youth.
Of course it can be way lower, but the other pull might have talent 6 or worse for example, this player wont.
The talent is good if my player will pop to solid pace in 2 weeks.
It is impossible to be sure about him now.
I do train this kind of players for ages.
(edited)
Of course it can be way lower, but the other pull might have talent 6 or worse for example, this player wont.
The talent is good if my player will pop to solid pace in 2 weeks.
It is impossible to be sure about him now.
I do train this kind of players for ages.
(edited)
You are right, he could be 3.5 if he went from something like 6.00 -> 6.99 in two trainings and then went to [7] with huge surplus in the third training.
I looked closer on my data on this player and it implies* that he was at least 6.20 after he popped to [6] pace, but indeed was veeery close to [7] after two trainings. Now if you train him in pace in next 6 weeks it should either be 2 to [8] and 4 to [9], or 3 to [8] and 3 to [9]
* Based on his value after each training (which depends on exact skills values with decimal part), but don't ask for details on these calculations, it's too complicated to explain :P
I looked closer on my data on this player and it implies* that he was at least 6.20 after he popped to [6] pace, but indeed was veeery close to [7] after two trainings. Now if you train him in pace in next 6 weeks it should either be 2 to [8] and 4 to [9], or 3 to [8] and 3 to [9]
* Based on his value after each training (which depends on exact skills values with decimal part), but don't ask for details on these calculations, it's too complicated to explain :P
Thanks for the explanation.
Unfortunately I dont think that I will train him in pace for 6 weeks now.
(edited)
Unfortunately I dont think that I will train him in pace for 6 weeks now.
(edited)
what about mine own junior.. 16y :) i think he is the best talent in my team
i cant wait to see for 2 days if he jump on 6 pace for first training on pace with these 6gt also :)
(edited)
i cant wait to see for 2 days if he jump on 6 pace for first training on pace with these 6gt also :)
(edited)
18yo aroynd 6,5m r or n?
hopeless stamina, tragic keeper
very good pace, solid defender
very good technique, adequate playmaker
solid passing, excellent striker
hopeless stamina, tragic keeper
very good pace, solid defender
very good technique, adequate playmaker
solid passing, excellent striker