Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: [NT] World Cup
Correct. England and Peru also tried on the field and failed. No one scolds them?
It is everyone's choice which field they play on. Bulgaria didn't lose because of the pitch, that's how the engine of the game wanted it to be. Surprises also happen, unpleasant for some, happy for others. I've been in these situations too...so...let's play with what we have.
I have a similar opinion that there was supposed to be a surprise in this match.
If the favorites kept winning, this match would make no sense.
(edited)
If the favorites kept winning, this match would make no sense.
(edited)
In Cinek's first World Cup match against Venezuela, a pitch with the same conditions was used, but Venezuela won 5-1.
Is it nice to play on such a pitch? It's not!
But is it wrong? It's not wrong either!
If it's allowed by Sokker, no matter how bad it is to play on such a pitch, it's not breaking any rules.
The problem is that you want to call everyone who shares a different opinion immoral.
If someone had to be punished, it wouldn't be the one who chose a bad pitch, but the one who is hurling insults at those who don't share his opinion.
And in my opinion, the coach can choose any pitch, it's wrong that we still have injuries in NT games.
I know it doesn't match real soccer, but how many things do we have here at Sokker that don't match reality either?
People forget that this is a game, something to have fun and pass the time for all of us, it's not real life.
Is it nice to play on such a pitch? It's not!
But is it wrong? It's not wrong either!
If it's allowed by Sokker, no matter how bad it is to play on such a pitch, it's not breaking any rules.
The problem is that you want to call everyone who shares a different opinion immoral.
If someone had to be punished, it wouldn't be the one who chose a bad pitch, but the one who is hurling insults at those who don't share his opinion.
And in my opinion, the coach can choose any pitch, it's wrong that we still have injuries in NT games.
I know it doesn't match real soccer, but how many things do we have here at Sokker that don't match reality either?
People forget that this is a game, something to have fun and pass the time for all of us, it's not real life.
And in my opinion, the coach can choose any pitch, it's wrong that we still have injuries in NT games.
I know it doesn't match real soccer, but how many things do we have here at Sokker that don't match reality either?
People forget that this is a game, something to have fun and pass the time for all of us, it's not real life.
Oh but it's NOT because it wouldn't be realistic. The only reasons we still have injuries in NT games is because many people wanted that and some people cried/shouted on the forum against making NT games arcade.
NT games could've been Arcade for longer than one year. We have what people decided.
They are supposed to change it to Arcade though, finally... we will see how long it takes them.
I know it doesn't match real soccer, but how many things do we have here at Sokker that don't match reality either?
People forget that this is a game, something to have fun and pass the time for all of us, it's not real life.
Oh but it's NOT because it wouldn't be realistic. The only reasons we still have injuries in NT games is because many people wanted that and some people cried/shouted on the forum against making NT games arcade.
NT games could've been Arcade for longer than one year. We have what people decided.
They are supposed to change it to Arcade though, finally... we will see how long it takes them.
And just to complete my reasoning, in real life Bolivia has chosen to play in a field more than 4,000 meters above the sea for the South American Qualifiers for the World Cup, something that is totally bad for their opponents and their health, they need to have several oxygen cylinders for the players. They have won games there because of this and yet FIFA allows such conditions.
I don't care whatever the score is. It doesn't matter who he is. What is important for me and many coaches is that the risk of injury is very high.
so if NT games are arcades, would be ok to use bad pitch stadiums? because here we have 2 different problems, injuries and conditions to play.
Edit:
just to remember, no injuries in Saudi-Bulgary and there were another 6 games with injuries, almost of all of them in NT stadiums
(edited)
Edit:
just to remember, no injuries in Saudi-Bulgary and there were another 6 games with injuries, almost of all of them in NT stadiums
(edited)
I agree with that!
What I disagree with is saying that it's immoral, when in fact it's allowed by Sokker.
For me, the right thing to do would be not to have injuries in the NT, it would put an end to all this worry about injured players, which is bad for all of us.
What I disagree with is saying that it's immoral, when in fact it's allowed by Sokker.
For me, the right thing to do would be not to have injuries in the NT, it would put an end to all this worry about injured players, which is bad for all of us.
It's been allowed since the beginning of Sokker, but that does not make it moral! It's like a disease spreading in this World Cup. I'm equally ashamed of the coach of England and Peru strus is a D star what example is this? It's a bad example that no one should follow. The thought of even thinking about doing it makes me sick.
I just don't see the point that Saudi Arabia use this pitch. They can't win world cup so what is the reason to play on that pitch. Only result will be to risk players to take injury.
"They can't win world cup so what is the reason to play on that pitch"
Well they can't win the World Cup so what is the reason to play at all...?
Lots of teams can't win the WC, so why bother...?
Every NT has their goal which they can consider success. For Arabia already qualifying was a huge success, getting a WC win is BIG. If they actually qualify to next round it will one of biggest World Cup achievements in last years. That's why they tried to maximise their chance to win and they got the results they wanted.
Well they can't win the World Cup so what is the reason to play at all...?
Lots of teams can't win the WC, so why bother...?
Every NT has their goal which they can consider success. For Arabia already qualifying was a huge success, getting a WC win is BIG. If they actually qualify to next round it will one of biggest World Cup achievements in last years. That's why they tried to maximise their chance to win and they got the results they wanted.
Big achievement is when Crna Gora U21 become a World cup champion. If Saudi Arabia pass the group after 2 seasons noone will remember for this. If for some one who is on WC is to take a win okay maybe everyone have different goals :)
(edited)
(edited)
We are talking about a country which started qualifiers at 80+ rank, was playing for rating 70 and has TWO (2) users. Yes, going to a World Cup after eliminating rating 76-78 Scotland is a big thing, beating Bulgaria is a big thing.
Whether people remember that in 10 seasons is irrelevant. I have no idea who won last 5 World Cups (except for trga because he keeps reminding about it).
Whether people remember that in 10 seasons is irrelevant. I have no idea who won last 5 World Cups (except for trga because he keeps reminding about it).