Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: [U21] World Cup , by Krzysztof/
Krzysztof, once again thank you for this informative summary! I like your short reports about every match very much!!
PS: Just a small correction on the average mark of:
Cuba U21 - Deutschland U21 0:2
55.9 average mark 56.4
PS: Just a small correction on the average mark of:
Cuba U21 - Deutschland U21 0:2
55.9 average mark 56.4
Bravo to Sweden U21 and its manager manuelmarques, who showed us that it is necessary to fight and it is possible to make a sensation which in this match was very close.
Wow... he shows a lot... lol, he basically was dominated all match and just have the luck to do not recieve a lot of goals during the match, this was the only reason to our match be 'close'.
Of course, looking at the statistics of 3 Shots 17 you can say that this was not the case, but what matters is the final result that goes out into the world.
But what the hell kind of analysis is this? Basically... we have more 1vs1 opportunities, we control more the match, attack more, makes the opponent do not be a problem most part of the game, but what matters is just the result? So... forget if we create the chances, just the final result matters to talk properly? Jeez... This result-oriented argument without contextualizing them makes me sick.
Woody you need to focus we are cheering and expecting a better game. There is nothing to combine you have the best squad and a huge advantage over your opponents, you just need to translate that into the game. The whole country is cheering.
You are cheering? Difficult to believe it... Because you give me the feeling that you don't watch the games, you just see the result and say something just because it's Poland. We create more chances than our opponents until now, recieve way less shots, this is not translate into the game? Not my fault we need to make more shots to score just 3 goals, these 2 matches, what do not lack of our part was create chances against our opponents.
You don't have to like me or my ideas, but I just ask for coherence in this analysis.
Player of the match: Isac Martinsson (Sveden) / GK
Yeah... Our striker score a hat-trick, makes the winning goal in minute 86, but player of the match is the swedish keeper... lol.
Wow... he shows a lot... lol, he basically was dominated all match and just have the luck to do not recieve a lot of goals during the match, this was the only reason to our match be 'close'.
Of course, looking at the statistics of 3 Shots 17 you can say that this was not the case, but what matters is the final result that goes out into the world.
But what the hell kind of analysis is this? Basically... we have more 1vs1 opportunities, we control more the match, attack more, makes the opponent do not be a problem most part of the game, but what matters is just the result? So... forget if we create the chances, just the final result matters to talk properly? Jeez... This result-oriented argument without contextualizing them makes me sick.
Woody you need to focus we are cheering and expecting a better game. There is nothing to combine you have the best squad and a huge advantage over your opponents, you just need to translate that into the game. The whole country is cheering.
You are cheering? Difficult to believe it... Because you give me the feeling that you don't watch the games, you just see the result and say something just because it's Poland. We create more chances than our opponents until now, recieve way less shots, this is not translate into the game? Not my fault we need to make more shots to score just 3 goals, these 2 matches, what do not lack of our part was create chances against our opponents.
You don't have to like me or my ideas, but I just ask for coherence in this analysis.
Player of the match: Isac Martinsson (Sveden) / GK
Yeah... Our striker score a hat-trick, makes the winning goal in minute 86, but player of the match is the swedish keeper... lol.
Woody I respect your statement. Now the match against France U21, good luck my friend.
Very good analysis. Keep doing them, you make the game more fun.
Thanks
Thanks
Well, I don't think Krzystof has ever done any game analysis, but he has done a lot of summaries, a lot of short reports. So if someone expects to read details and backstories of the matches on the basis of these summaries, he has wrong expectations.
So Woody, don't be so critical of the reporter. A reporter does reportage (short text), not analysis (longer text). ;)
PS: And yes, Oskar Pozowski was for me the man of the match too, but I think Krzystof got some money from the manager of the Swedish keeper, to declare him as MoM! ;P
So Woody, don't be so critical of the reporter. A reporter does reportage (short text), not analysis (longer text). ;)
PS: And yes, Oskar Pozowski was for me the man of the match too, but I think Krzystof got some money from the manager of the Swedish keeper, to declare him as MoM! ;P
Exactly right, thank you for clarifying what I am doing.
Woody was too upset about it.
Woody you want an analysis then do it, on the other hand why analyze when what matters at the World Cup is the points that is the final score, not whether someone had 3 chances alone with the goalkeeper or maybe 2 crossbars. I wish you good luck because it will be needed in the last group match against France, better one chance in the match and a goal than 5 chances without a goal and then analyze,it will not give anything.
Therefore, I think that a light commentary on the match is enough.
(edited)
Woody was too upset about it.
Woody you want an analysis then do it, on the other hand why analyze when what matters at the World Cup is the points that is the final score, not whether someone had 3 chances alone with the goalkeeper or maybe 2 crossbars. I wish you good luck because it will be needed in the last group match against France, better one chance in the match and a goal than 5 chances without a goal and then analyze,it will not give anything.
Therefore, I think that a light commentary on the match is enough.
(edited)
Because you give me the feeling that you don't watch the games, you just see the result and say something just because it's Poland. We create more chances than our opponents until now, recieve way less shots, this is not translate into the game? Not my fault we need to make more shots to score just 3 goals, these 2 matches, what do not lack of our part was create chances against our opponents.
Did you see the game?
Sweden had only two-three chances to score, but these were GREAT chances
one on one, shot saved by goalkeeper, second shot to empty goal
one on one, penalty from behind
Poland had more situations, yes, but most of them were much, much worse
Lots of headers from no-situations, covered around by defenders, shots from distance, shots inside penalty with defenders all around
This always affects the scoring ratio, it's basic stuff...
(edited)
Did you see the game?
Sweden had only two-three chances to score, but these were GREAT chances
one on one, shot saved by goalkeeper, second shot to empty goal
one on one, penalty from behind
Poland had more situations, yes, but most of them were much, much worse
Lots of headers from no-situations, covered around by defenders, shots from distance, shots inside penalty with defenders all around
This always affects the scoring ratio, it's basic stuff...
(edited)
Belgium really has a subpar group of young players this season :-(
The level is very low now...because of # of users of course
Lots of teams playing for ~50
I checked u21 WC from years before, even weaker/smaller countries played for 54-56 back then
Lots of teams playing for ~50
I checked u21 WC from years before, even weaker/smaller countries played for 54-56 back then
I'm comparing to the player group from last season, this season is much worse :')