Subject: Vote to save our junior schools : a letter to the Devs.

Totally the opposite, the last weeks there have been more promising youths. I have years with the school open, I have not seen something like this before.

if you are lucky one week in few years, in term of probabilities it s not "totally the opposite". But good for you. Juts to know , what's your entries this week ?
(edited)

Rarely I open all the 30 maximun places for junior team, but this season I had to fire some players somehow promising because an increase of quality recruiting youths.

I got two youths this week that might stay, and it is really hard to fire some other players to have those 6 extra places for new youths. If devs, in order to have better players, have increased the quality of youths, they should also increase the amount of maximun places for junior team.


Alberto Valladares 16 2 (unsatisfactory) outfield 27 9 (very good)

Alexander Miyakawa 16 5 (average) outfield 28 12 (outstanding)

Roberto Cedrón 18 4 (weak) outfield 9 6 (adequate)

Tomás Viza 18 4 (weak) gk 31 12 (outstanding)

Paul Maza 17 0 (tragic) outfield 19 5 (average)

Cristóbal Arbulú 16 5 (average) outfield 14 9 (very good)
(edited)

this is all i got so far in this season... some people are lucky, some are not, nothing changed really with the system

Mirek Rek 16 adekvátní [6] Hráč v poli 10
Vojtěch Válek 16 zoufalé [1] Hráč v poli 23
Vladimír Hába 16 průměrné [5] Hráč v poli 22
Jáchym Dubec 16 zoufalé [1] Hráč v poli 25
Ludvík Kopanina 16 neuspokojivé [2] Hráč v poli 12
Čestmír Balka 16 zoufalé [1] Hráč v poli 24

Solid, i got only one junior 3rd weeks in a row. But today his skill is 2, last week i got a zero lol

+1

this is all i got so far in this season... some people are lucky, some are not, nothing changed really with the system

Except that, with a shorten season, probabilities are even poorer. That’s a change. Some are very lucky, most are not. Not only it’s unfair, but It puts the market under constant pressure too, when we have fewer and fewer young top players.

It sounds contradictory. It would be unfair if everybody would be lucky, but it is not about fairness, it is about probabilities.

That being said, if nothing changed in youth system( like in my personal case that I got four plus seasons without any top player from school), noticing a positive change, is somehow fair because the distribution works as a matter of time.

+1

It won't solve the problems associated with the youth academy, and we can always wait for the devs to do something... But... I've been working on making the academy a bit more fun.

Let me introduce you to SkTables Academy.
✓ Automatic talents calculation ✓ Evaluate juniors and find potential stars ✓ Clearly shows expected promotion level/age ✓ keep track of your juniors progression

Good luck all !

+1

+1!

+1

+10000 :D

I'm using SK tables as a tool and it is great, has lot more to offer as Sokker + subscription!

I make +1 only to make number of unhappy managers bigger!

I tried yesterday to make poll with Topic "Do you think Sokker should be as it was before 01.01.24?" and had - Server Internal error 500!

I never made new topic with poll, but how difficult it should be with 2 options Yes and No!

+1 from me

Vid Eminović ♣ 17 6 +2 19 3 ✓ 81% 18.7 12 A

how true is this, according to your table?