Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: internal substitutions
- 1
- 2
DIDIz to
All
Its crazy!!!!
I no longer understand this stupid game and the laggy interface of the tactics.
I changed the formation in case of a loosing , because of the change of the formation, the numbers of the players got a little messed up, so I made internal substitutions within the formation, and it didn't work!
I lost critical points in a championship fight on this retarded thing. I don't understand anymore if I'm doing something wrong, or this game is super stupid!!!
look :
first tactic : https://imgur.com/a/gOK2N89
additional tactic : https://imgur.com/a/Ae8XUZr
substitutions : https://imgur.com/a/QeuhmUn
whats wrong here?!
why Patroclo Conti Filippini (number 8) become striker (number 10) in additional tactic ?
why Marius Ştefan Chiş (number 10) become Num 8?
and why Cyprian Trzepieciński become number 9 ?!
I am so frustrated
I no longer understand this stupid game and the laggy interface of the tactics.
I changed the formation in case of a loosing , because of the change of the formation, the numbers of the players got a little messed up, so I made internal substitutions within the formation, and it didn't work!
I lost critical points in a championship fight on this retarded thing. I don't understand anymore if I'm doing something wrong, or this game is super stupid!!!
look :
first tactic : https://imgur.com/a/gOK2N89
additional tactic : https://imgur.com/a/Ae8XUZr
substitutions : https://imgur.com/a/QeuhmUn
whats wrong here?!
why Patroclo Conti Filippini (number 8) become striker (number 10) in additional tactic ?
why Marius Ştefan Chiş (number 10) become Num 8?
and why Cyprian Trzepieciński become number 9 ?!
I am so frustrated
You need to leave same numbers in both tactics with same orders :/
But in the first tactic, the strikers are 11 and 9. In the second tactic, the strikers are 11 and 10..
if so , Cyprian Trzepieciński (number 10) will be the striker in the additional tactic , and I want him on the winger position not as striker...
(edited)
if so , Cyprian Trzepieciński (number 10) will be the striker in the additional tactic , and I want him on the winger position not as striker...
(edited)
For example
10 11 ATT first tactic
10 11 ATT second
It is best option to make 2 tactics based on same tactic sample
10 11 ATT first tactic
10 11 ATT second
It is best option to make 2 tactics based on same tactic sample
Yes, of course next time that's what I'll do. But that doesn't give me the answer of what did I do wrong here?
According to the instructions I gave, what is wrong?
I gave an order to number 8 becomes 9
number 9 becomes 10
why it didn't happen?
According to the instructions I gave, what is wrong?
I gave an order to number 8 becomes 9
number 9 becomes 10
why it didn't happen?
You fucked up the changes.
Players keep their numbers even after change.
So you:
moved number 9 to position of number 10
Then you moved number 8 on for position of number 9
But then position of number 9 was already number 10 = you moved number 8 on position of number 10 and you number 9 (starting) moved from 10 to 8
Players keep their numbers even after change.
So you:
moved number 9 to position of number 10
Then you moved number 8 on for position of number 9
But then position of number 9 was already number 10 = you moved number 8 on position of number 10 and you number 9 (starting) moved from 10 to 8
because its 3 players needs to reaplce a role
so what is the correct way to do it in this situation?
so what is the correct way to do it in this situation?
I will ask my question more precisely
I wanted Marius Ştefan Chiş to be number 10 in my alternative tactic
wanted Cyprian Trzepieciński to be 8 ,
and Patroclo Conti Filippini to be 9
how can I do that?
I wanted Marius Ştefan Chiş to be number 10 in my alternative tactic
wanted Cyprian Trzepieciński to be 8 ,
and Patroclo Conti Filippini to be 9
how can I do that?
You first need to respect the orders of tactic number 2.
Then you need to change player either before or after the tacticchange, but beware changes before the other tactic, cause if the ball doesn't go out of play in between both the täctic and the player changes, then it will happen after the tactic change in stead of before. So then all numbers will be messed up.
The best thing is to change the numbers of tactic number 1 corresponding with tactic number 2, so the orders will never be messed up.
Then you need to change player either before or after the tacticchange, but beware changes before the other tactic, cause if the ball doesn't go out of play in between both the täctic and the player changes, then it will happen after the tactic change in stead of before. So then all numbers will be messed up.
The best thing is to change the numbers of tactic number 1 corresponding with tactic number 2, so the orders will never be messed up.
I don’t think you have any idea what you’re talking about here, the tactics doesn’t matter here, it doesn’t mess up anything, it’s just about the proper numbers
Actually making the exchanges after the tactic change was on purpose so that they would already be in their new positions.
I think but you gave me the answer, maybe because the ball didn't come out, so the change in tactics and the change in numbers got messed up. So in such a situation, it means that the difference between the instructions should be made at least 10 minutes, which is also a bit stupid.
In any case, the options are so limited and the way you switch between tactics without significantly being able to even change a player from role MID to a ATT, it's just sad...
we are after the middle of 2024, it's just a few simple code lines to improve the tactical interface + options .
I think but you gave me the answer, maybe because the ball didn't come out, so the change in tactics and the change in numbers got messed up. So in such a situation, it means that the difference between the instructions should be made at least 10 minutes, which is also a bit stupid.
In any case, the options are so limited and the way you switch between tactics without significantly being able to even change a player from role MID to a ATT, it's just sad...
we are after the middle of 2024, it's just a few simple code lines to improve the tactical interface + options .
It will be best just to redo the tactic so you always have 10 and 11 (or 9 and 10 whatever you want) in the ATT roles
As for this situation
Starting Filipini (8), Chis (9), Trzepiecinski (10)
Ending Trzepiecinski (8), Chis (10), Filipini (9)
Subs:
Filipini on position 9
Chis on position 10
As for this situation
Starting Filipini (8), Chis (9), Trzepiecinski (10)
Ending Trzepiecinski (8), Chis (10), Filipini (9)
Subs:
Filipini on position 9
Chis on position 10
i did correct numbers bro
it just the ball didn't go out and instead of making the exchanges in a logical order that I made , it made them all at once and created a problem
it just the ball didn't go out and instead of making the exchanges in a logical order that I made , it made them all at once and created a problem
Don’t listen to him, he is just messing everything and creating confusion, tactic change has nothing to do with player changes, you messed up the player changes.
Read what I wrote, you messed up the changes because players don’t change the numbers
Or do whatever, honestly I don’t care
Or do whatever, honestly I don’t care
- 1
- 2