Azərbaycan dili Bahasa Indonesia Bosanski Català Čeština Dansk Deutsch Eesti English Español Français Galego Hrvatski Italiano Latviešu Lietuvių Magyar Malti Mакедонски Nederlands Norsk Polski Português Português BR Românã Slovenčina Srpski Suomi Svenska Tiếng Việt Türkçe Ελληνικά Български Русский Українська Հայերեն ქართული ენა 中文
Subpage under development, new version coming soon!

Subject: »Sokker Questions/Answers

2007-11-18 08:09:39
Message deleted

2007-11-18 08:31:09
You're purposely provoking. Last warning, stop it.
2007-11-18 12:53:24
Message deleted

2007-11-18 13:10:48
Form also has much influence on technique and on passing.
2007-11-18 15:03:27
6. Public protests to moderators or administrators punishment decisions must not be made.
- Any person disagreeing with one moderator’s or administrator’s decision is allowed to contact with another moderator or administrator to clarify the situation. The outcome of this appeal (which may result in the change of the punishment) will be unquestionable and final.

(edited)
2007-11-19 02:58:18
I will say this CLEARLY.

"Idiot", "geek", and similar words are NOT profanity and ARE legal, depending on the context.

If you insult a user, it is against the rules. If you call someone an idiot or stupid, that is not allowed.

This is so clear and obvious, it is really ridiculous.

There are a few words that are profanity, and the use of those words are illegal. "f", "s", "c" 4-letter words and some others...

What barhilo did was not insulting a specific user. If anyone takes offense by being personally insulted by barhilo, contact me. if you take offense by a staff member using a legal word in a legal context in this case, i'm sorry but you have a different view of what is proper and not.

And i 100% agree that staff members should hold themselves to an entirely different standard, and have contacted staff members to correct behavior that would have been legal from a normal user. This was NOT such a case.



@coach53: You have wasted hours of my time complaining about barhilo, and have never shown me a single post by him which i even considered questionable. And, if you did have a problem, you may email admins@sokker.org or any admin other than me.

@Basil Brush, you are also attacking a mod publically without any good reason as well.


Everyone else who's involved here, please see gibby's past post about how to complain about staff actions.


Otherwise, lets get this back on topic. 5 pages wasted on this rubbish.
(edited)
2007-11-19 06:47:59
The 'c' word is 'cut'?
2007-11-19 08:59:12
The c word that women everywhere hate.
(edited)
2007-11-19 10:46:57
Ok, that's 'cut' :P
2007-11-21 06:17:21
this was a good thread, sorry it got derailed by that junk before. Bumping it in the hopes it goes back to being valuable.
2007-11-21 17:37:30
@Basil Brush, you are also attacking a mod publically without any good reason as well.

---
I know mate. I learned my lesson.
2007-11-21 21:45:32
Question: If a NT player gets a red card in a friendly, does that apply to the next qualification match? Can he play?
2007-11-21 21:48:20
No. All NT cards are treated the same. If he got a red card last week, he will be suspended this week.
2007-11-21 22:03:14
Was gjergii talking about NT friendly or club's friendly?
2007-11-21 23:41:03
I assumed he was referring to Adriatik Dreshaj, who picked up his 3rd NT yellow last weekend. He will not be available this weekend.
2007-11-22 10:46:28
Q: If i buy a player that has played during the week for his previous team, will he get training if he doesn't play for my team that week?

I think he will get, because in the rules isn't said that he had to play for your team, but to be sure...