Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: Junior Talent
Patrikas Trekšelis, age: 17 [+1] (ID 26333919)
[10 +4]excellent junior (10,00)
Average pop: 3,00
[8]solid form
[0]tragic stamina [0]tragic keeper
[8]solid pace [5]average defender
[4]weak technique [8]solid playmaker
[3]poor passing [5]average striker
Sum of skills: [33] = [33] + [0] stamina
6 6 5 6 6 7 8 7 8 8 8 8 9 9 8 8 9 9 8 9 9 10 9 10
Trainers average skill [15]magical (15,0)
Weeks all 29 weeks
Exit date 2021-07-15
Begin skill level [6]adequate
Begin age 16
Number of pops 9
Spent money 29 000 €
[10 +4]excellent junior (10,00)
Average pop: 3,00
[8]solid form
[0]tragic stamina [0]tragic keeper
[8]solid pace [5]average defender
[4]weak technique [8]solid playmaker
[3]poor passing [5]average striker
Sum of skills: [33] = [33] + [0] stamina
6 6 5 6 6 7 8 7 8 8 8 8 9 9 8 8 9 9 8 9 9 10 9 10
Trainers average skill [15]magical (15,0)
Weeks all 29 weeks
Exit date 2021-07-15
Begin skill level [6]adequate
Begin age 16
Number of pops 9
Spent money 29 000 €
dude he didnt pop 9 times, is cause he is using an outdated external program....
Talent in youth school is not calculated properly, apart from that a perfect software, a way better than paid in-game features (plus).
Talent in youth school is not calculated properly, apart from that a perfect software, a way better than paid in-game features (plus).
Wrong, please stop spreading false rumors.
After some time in the youth school, with an ET coach, the junior up according to his talent.
La paternal player is a good example of this and I have more of these kind.
Wrong, please stop spreading false rumors.
After some time in the youth school, with an ET coach, the junior up according to his talent.
La paternal player is a good example of this and I have more of these kind.
Wrong, please stop spreading false rumors.
This is very insulting statement. But I can see that you cannot read english so i do not take it seriously.
We are talking about sokker viewer calculations. "The best" example is on top of this page.
Next time think twice, before you write something.
This is very insulting statement. But I can see that you cannot read english so i do not take it seriously.
We are talking about sokker viewer calculations. "The best" example is on top of this page.
Next time think twice, before you write something.
you cannot read english
This is very insulting.
Please stop spreading false rumors about me !
This is very insulting.
Please stop spreading false rumors about me !
I send it again because no one answer me :/
what about this junior? he doesn´t pop down since a lot of weeks around 12-13, he can reach magical? he should right?
[url=https://ibb.co/H23xdTQ][/url]
what about this junior? he doesn´t pop down since a lot of weeks around 12-13, he can reach magical? he should right?
[url=https://ibb.co/H23xdTQ][/url]
Maybe but... There's a theory that the best talent is 3.3, so he could not arrive to make a whole pop
Also, first weeks don't seem to ensure him a top talent
Also, first weeks don't seem to ensure him a top talent
No but the last 12-13 weeks seems to be a very nice talent, i dont know if a top one, but his talent should be very good! The weird thing is that he popped from 11 to 14 all in 3 weeks without down pops
(edited)
(edited)