Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: [bug] with subs
- 1
Tad to
All
I made a mistake in orders - I had some orders losing by at most 3 goals and losing by at least 3 goals.
What I do not understand:
Ambersley and Deloffre got on the pitch on minute 4 - the game was 0-0 at that time so I was not losing...
On minute 68, I was losing by 3 goals (0:3) but Sams and Silverstein did NOT get on the pitch.
Seems like a bug to me
https://sokker.org/stats/matchID/42309558/teamID/141271
match orders:
Min. Condition / Action
1' losing by at most 3 goals
Lawrence Ambersley on position 5
1' losing by at most 3 goals
Salah Deloffre on position 6
1' red card or no player
Danny Tvede on position 2
1' red card or no player
Danny Tvede on position 3
1' red card or no player
Danny Tvede on position 4
1' red card or no player
Danny Tvede on position 5
1' red card or no player
Danny Tvede on position 7
1' losing by at least 3 goals
Aidan Sams on position 3
1' losing by at least 3 goals
Tyler Silverstein on position 4
What I do not understand:
Ambersley and Deloffre got on the pitch on minute 4 - the game was 0-0 at that time so I was not losing...
On minute 68, I was losing by 3 goals (0:3) but Sams and Silverstein did NOT get on the pitch.
Seems like a bug to me
https://sokker.org/stats/matchID/42309558/teamID/141271
match orders:
Min. Condition / Action
1' losing by at most 3 goals
Lawrence Ambersley on position 5
1' losing by at most 3 goals
Salah Deloffre on position 6
1' red card or no player
Danny Tvede on position 2
1' red card or no player
Danny Tvede on position 3
1' red card or no player
Danny Tvede on position 4
1' red card or no player
Danny Tvede on position 5
1' red card or no player
Danny Tvede on position 7
1' losing by at least 3 goals
Aidan Sams on position 3
1' losing by at least 3 goals
Tyler Silverstein on position 4
kryminator to
Tad
it is a bug, but those "at most" conditions are either, wrongly phrased or wrongly working, since day 1
in reality it is not "losing by at most 3 goals" (which implies losing), but rather something like "at most losing by 3 goals" (which I think would imply that winning or drawing is ok and one have to be losing by 4 or more goals to not met conditions)
in reality it is not "losing by at most 3 goals" (which implies losing), but rather something like "at most losing by 3 goals" (which I think would imply that winning or drawing is ok and one have to be losing by 4 or more goals to not met conditions)
- 1