Subject: »[info]DevDiary 80: “Price is what you pay, value is what

90% of the base doesn't care about NT games. If they don't have a player on it, the probably don't care :D

90% of the base doesn't care about NT games

I want stats to back your statement up, cause I relate that the NT community is bigger than 10% of ACTIVE game managers... Bot teams cannot be included in this count.

Not sure how I could find that, so I guess neither of us is right.

I could give two craps for the NT and all the emphasis it gets. It's nothing but a play toy for the top 5% in this game.

I think there was some info about how many users actually watched NT games and it was very low, don't remember the details

I agree though that MAIN team experience/fun is much more important than NT experience/fun

I'm top 5%. Finally!

It's a gross estimate, but if you determined how many active users have NT players out of 8000...
but yes, I see you are :) That's not bad work for two years in game. It will be my goal to have a NT player in two years too. Although I probably still won't care about the NT then, either.

I'm more interested in trying to keep new American users around.

There should be a mechanism where the DT of a National Team can automatically release a player who is in a BOT team

What about the income reduction to stadium attendance? is there some info about how that will work and what should we expect in terms % reductions to the income? and how it will be related to the new fan expectations?

We decided to hold that idea - expectatnions will affect club economy for sure, but it is hard to predict right now how much and in what direction (pro inflation or against). So we decided to wait, introduce expectations first, and then look for stats if reduction is still needed.

5subs will be finally introduced and tested at monday, not today. It will be less risk in terms of NTs

fucking shit takes me!! I haven't competed for 2 seasons and I intend to build my team around the first good-level fucking young player I get in more than 10 years in sokker and in a national team game he gets injured for 21 days, 3 weeks of training lost by a group of retarded, who still does not understand that they are screwing up the game.

2 weeks of training.

this week count? if player are injury I understand that not count.

This week doesn't count.
On wednesday he will have 17 day of injury - 1st training lost
Next week wednesday 10 days - 2nd training lost
And next wednesday already slight injury. He can get 50% of advanced training without playing any minutes if you don't want to risk. Or you can give him some minutes, your choice. But still he would get some training.

It is bad luck but happens to us all.
(edited)

But this is wrong, man. I think it's important to express it and make it clear that it is a disastrous proposal for the game. A few minutes ago I read that a 20-year-old youth was injured for more than 40 days, it's horrible

Love the fact that it was announced after AFC home teams played their games :)
So in short - week after introducing wider bench Your team still cannot implement 5 subs per game even thou we received first "we test it" message last Saturday?