Subject: »[info]DevDiary 80: “Price is what you pay, value is what

I think that if what they want is less daytrading, then it's not enough with penalizing the day trader with a tax. I think there should be an extra prize for the training manager that buys to train.

So in my opinion the best approach would be adding a tax for daytrading (let's say, when you sell a player before he spends 1 whole season), but giving a "previous club" income from the transfer to the previous clubs where the player spent more than 1 whole uninterrupted season. That way the stimulus to keep the player at least 1 season would be both sided: penalty if you dont, prize if you do.
(edited)

---

What is the chance of making sokker open source? I'm a programmer and I'm sure there are other managers who are also and can contribute to the game

My guess... 0%

If your are wrong than still pretty close to truth.

it's already back to old system

Good news.
Now they have to rethink it and introduce it in a smarter way.

in a smarter way?
I think we're lucky if there will be an introduction at all :-p

They should just do it similar to Geston's suggestion.

Newsflash. We got our money back from taxes!
(edited)

is it visible in the office? the message about it

They note it as a 'repayment'. That's all.

Yea. Thanks

great deal.

nice one. Thanks kryminator!

It looks like opposite if you check in office page your financial overview.

I had only one player sold like for 1000 and got 920 from sale and i have now 20 as outcome under "Returns and compensations".

So i would say its 10% from sale. Idk maybe someone got more taxed and now money back

In me office it says i got X on return. But in finances, this value X is negative. So is more money coming out. Is it correct?