Subject: [GD] International Cup

now when you participate in Champions cup you have 4 official matches + national team.
I can solve it for you very easily - just buy more players.
Devs wanted to make sure that a team can't play with 11 players, it is already done, so i don't see any problem. Teams will not be so unbeatable and will have to have varity of players.

when you watch when you prepare we do not want hatrick 2 to watch results only ..

tiaaa
he said what he knew


the creators want the teams to have more players ??, from where, how max. the number of training players is 10, there are no valuable players on TL, unless there is something for your cucumber league :)
(edited)

Your transfers has been proven wrong time and time again, and yet here you are bringing it up again.

Yes it does help. Yes it's a lot easier when the transfer market doesn't solely exist in a timezone between 3am-6am, but compared to the guaranteed sponsorship and gate receipts of large countries, it is tiny.

Borkos: 165 294 375 $ from transfers in 939 weeks = 176 026 $ - can guarantee your average sponsorship over that time is more than that let alone the sponsorship + gate receipts

Now the rest of Ekstraklasa

Wisla - 144 040 $ per week
ASRIM - 92 197 $ per week
Kajoza - 24 927 $ per week
Domik - 70 675 $ per week
Chelmek - 1 120 $ per week
WislaKrakow - 61 082 $ per week
Japanese - 116 907 $ per week
MOSP - -55 574 $ per week >> yes negative money per week
Polonia - 216 954 $ per week
Tobol - 395 070 $ per week
vordamm - -23 094 $ per week >> also negative
Shedenders - -48 260 $ per week >> also negative

So with the exception of a couple of big transfer people, these numbers pale in comparison to what they get in sponsorship due to the system that benefits large nations, let alone gate receipts which are also increased because of the ability to have increased fanclub members.

And why do many Australians have old players, same with other small countries? Because that's what they can afford due to those inequalities. Most trainees they take on don't even register on your radar as being a trainee. Its easier to make money when you have money.

And as far as your drifting comment goes. Where are the small nations meant to go? They are already in the top league of their country. They have nowhere else to go. Having a stronger team means more expenses but because they can't move up levels, there is no increased income to warrant keeping a stronger team, which is why I suggest the International LEAGUE being a better idea, and all sponsorship being linked to this. Gives everyone a goal for promoting, gives everyone a chance at better sponsorship, and whilst it won't make up for 16yrs of inequalities, it does stop it from continuing and suddenly the game becomes more exciting for everyone as over time (years in this game) new names will start to rise to the top, new countries able to compete.

My cucumber league:)))

I would win over you every day every night

Before the training reform, 10-22 players could be trained.
Now there are only 10 training places, even though we need to have more players because of a higher number of matches per week and the new energy system.

I agree it would be fun to have more spaces in advanced training.
I think eventually it will happen as after 5-7 seasons market will be empty
(edited)

Devs say they don't want to make the game too easy by adding 1 more training place because you could have the starting line-up just from trained players. But would it be the case if you would have to change the line-up all the time because of injuries, cards, energy?

"the game too easy by adding 1 more training place because you could have the starting line-up..."

So you just buy one player without training, let's say keeper and this is even more easy game, this argument doesn't change anything.
As I told before, I think eventually it will be added after several seasons.

Why didn't you respond to what Xineon does for a couple of years? He's from a small country, has a very strong team = it's possible to do it.

Yes it's a lot easier when the transfer market doesn't solely exist in a timezone between 3am-6am

The market is much longer than 3 hours
It's easily high time between 17 and 22 = 5 hours
At weekends it's basically high time all the time since 12 to 22, and fresh youths are sold at Thursday = you can buy them at weekend

of course it's worse
but it doesn't make people train players worth 1-1000 euro like some do when playing in top leagues

Borkos: 661 177 500 zł from transfers in 939 weeks = 704 103 zł - can guarantee your average sponsorship over that time is more than that let alone the sponsorship + gate receipts

I'm sorry but this argument is not valid because wages etc. are also higher while playing at high level [55-65 is not a high level]

And why do many Australians have old players, same with other small countries? Because that's what they can afford due to those inequalities. Most trainees they take on don't even register on your radar as being a trainee. It's easier to make money when you have money.

they have old average players because they don't invest in training = they only buy ready players from the money they get from tickets and sponsors

And I asked you to look at Australian league:

Chelsea has -69.5m euro in transfers
cisco has -65m euro in transfers
Team Moose has -117m euro in transfers
Ukmerges has -107m euro in transfers

this shows clearly that they spend on transfers much, much more than they earn from transfers - so how are sponsors the problem here?

Most trainees they take on don't even register on your radar as being a trainee. Its easier to make money when you have money.

that's not true
there are lots of teams that started during last year and they already made a huge profit
you actually don't make a lot of money on those high level players, you make most money on average 16-17yo players with high pace and one/two very low skills

how much do you think I get from sponsors? I get around 170 000 euro
I pay more to my coaches than I get from sponsors

I don't know if anyone has written it, but it could be that the weaker teams would play group matches first, then be joined by the stronger teams, and after 1 or 2 group rounds, then would the knockout stage the even stronger teams also join again. Something like that. In this way, the money would be distributed equally, and there would not be such huge gaps.

This seams as a great idea!

That might limit the number of teams taking part in competition because of a fixed number of weeks

i think in a club tournaments it could be that tournament is played during 2 seasons, first season group games, second season playoff stage.
If it is possible in U21 National level, I don't see any problems doing it in clubs tournament

Just merge the leagues, no need to complicate things. Otherwise it will still be a niche competition for small part of teams and remain distorted by teams having different income in differently sized countries anyway.

Create arcade leagues/cups for additional competition with trophies shown on team pages. That would both allow customization for different levels/formats of play, wouldnt give advantage to international league participants in country league against those, who cant participate and wouldnt worsen injury situation. And would bring money in for the devs.

Hi Raul, can you review "Penalty kicks" issue?
I dont know exactly what devs do, but the "efficiency rate" it´s too low.

I see many, many games, from different countries, and U21, Senior, club teams, friendlies, everything.
I see (as more of us spoke in forums) that it is ALMOST IMPOSIBLE to score a penalty kick.

Please review that, make more real, more equilibrate.
That will be an excellent improve to general results.

Thanks for always reply, and talk to the community.

; )