Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: [Idea] Merge of small countries/leagues
Kazakhstan only has 1 user, this guy deserves the merger of small countries right now, just like many other examples but this one surprised me!
If You'll look closely there may be more examples like that. One that surprised my was South Korea. It shows that there are 13 players, but when You check them it is actually only 1 (like the guy from Kazachstan). In their first league You'll find that 7 accounts are banned, 4 teams are not logging anymore (or never logged) and one player is "active". Player in 2nd level league is logging with USA IP, so I would assume that we will soon be banned for that...
It makes no sense to devote time, effort and money today in order to work on countries that have 1-10 users. It's simply not a sensible time etc. investment.
They have to invest the resources to changes and improvements that work globally or involve a high % of users (for example top countries / most interested and active users etc.).
Also, since they plan to advertise the game when it's finished, it doesn't make sense to redo the countries/leagues at the moment, because after the promo some can grow instantly and some might not grow at all. Then you'd have to redo the leagues/countries again, which is always at some point unfair to the users (as we've seen with the league migrations this season).
They have to invest the resources to changes and improvements that work globally or involve a high % of users (for example top countries / most interested and active users etc.).
Also, since they plan to advertise the game when it's finished, it doesn't make sense to redo the countries/leagues at the moment, because after the promo some can grow instantly and some might not grow at all. Then you'd have to redo the leagues/countries again, which is always at some point unfair to the users (as we've seen with the league migrations this season).
We loosing dedicated users that cannot be replaced with 1000 new users that will not stay a week in the game ...even if they stay they will not pay pluses ...
You're losing which dedicated users? From Kazakhstan, where there is 1 guy without plus? From Marocco, 6 users, 0 pluses?
The game lost many dedicated users from big countries and that's the real problem
For the game it doesn't really matter to keep 20 users from smallest countries, it matters to bring in x thousands regular users and that's where they need to dedicate their resources
The game lost many dedicated users from big countries and that's the real problem
For the game it doesn't really matter to keep 20 users from smallest countries, it matters to bring in x thousands regular users and that's where they need to dedicate their resources
The solution is to fix the game bugs and improve some features so the devs can PROMOTE the game through social media , google ads and generally online advertisments to bring more users from small countries. Any merge will not help the minor communities to increase their members.If we want to save the game from our side we can suggest improvements and we can always ask a friend or family if he would like to join or try to play the game.
yes if changes that are made are in right direction for now only training reform and 2d viewer transformation is positive thing...
its not right to dream on imaginary 100k users that will never pay than focus on those that actually paying ...
speed up of game is a mistake 2 weeks will not satisfy people that want fast game sokker is not that but will break all patient users here with insane injury ratio and lack of time to do line ups ...
its not right to dream on imaginary 100k users that will never pay than focus on those that actually paying ...
speed up of game is a mistake 2 weeks will not satisfy people that want fast game sokker is not that but will break all patient users here with insane injury ratio and lack of time to do line ups ...
its not right to dream on imaginary 100k users that will never pay than focus on those that actually paying ...
from business point of view it's exactly the opposite of what you write
they did not invest tens of thousands of euro just to keep small country users happy and to have the same game that lost 90% of its users in ten years
from business point of view it's exactly the opposite of what you write
they did not invest tens of thousands of euro just to keep small country users happy and to have the same game that lost 90% of its users in ten years
its not about keeping happy small countries and users is about keeping happy every single user ....
lol
and making changes for small countries will make users from big countries happy? no, it won't.
they are improving the game for all, that's what they are doing. you are writing that they should concentrate on changes that will impact a small % of users. its nonsense.
and making changes for small countries will make users from big countries happy? no, it won't.
they are improving the game for all, that's what they are doing. you are writing that they should concentrate on changes that will impact a small % of users. its nonsense.
im for equal starts for all even if that means merge all countries in one division structure ...
well i run away from socialism :) and that is nothing to do with this
there is another simple solution allow people to register in other countries then is their choice :)