Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: [info] Training issue - solutions
Bring back the old pages in matches,the new one is worthless!!pfff
+1
+1
@raul we have only one life we want the game playable now not sure whats your plans and when the puzzele will be ready but the best approach would be after flash was fixed to do sokker 2.0 on new servers with restart and all the things you want and keep sokker 1.0 as it is with just bug fixing
mobile game was big fail and shame you guys did not took in consideration that sokker is not for kids is for addicted adults :(
mobile game was big fail and shame you guys did not took in consideration that sokker is not for kids is for addicted adults :(
About passing and PM, in my opinion, passing is way more important for defenders and I like and I find logical as it's right now, everyone can be trained in passing, even strikers...
I think the point is that these tactical decisions should be free, they are over-conditioning and limiting the user's performance, we are talking about a tactical game.
I think the point is that these tactical decisions should be free, they are over-conditioning and limiting the user's performance, we are talking about a tactical game.
something unfair to train so much and only reaches 30 years to lose skills quickly, example I buy or leave school a 17-year-old youth, I train him for 12 seasons, I do crack and NT, he turns 30 and his skill drops, Stop bothering me, in real football a 30-year-old player doesn't drop performance and skills So. If it is going to cost us so much to train high skills, it must compensate with slower descents, otherwise it is an unfair training system that does not value our patience, time and effort.
28 y players drop pace if hes pace superdivine. in 28 y??? Come on...
@raul we have only one life
That's scary, are you sure bout that ??
That's scary, are you sure bout that ??
Hi Raul, I think it would be nice to get rid of 18y old "fresh" youth players until you re-design youth academy
Mate... you must keep it as it was before the reduction.
You have already ''cut'' the weeks,and if you reduce the higher levels training then we talk about disaster!
Add if you want higher than now skills,but don't change the training as it was.
Why you change something that was fine in game,you guys you are something else ...!
The game having so many probs and you start changing the good parts of the game!!
Unbelievable
I totally agree.
You have already ''cut'' the weeks,and if you reduce the higher levels training then we talk about disaster!
Add if you want higher than now skills,but don't change the training as it was.
Why you change something that was fine in game,you guys you are something else ...!
The game having so many probs and you start changing the good parts of the game!!
Unbelievable
I totally agree.
he will also often take too much time to make a decision or even sometimes "freeze" which often ends up with winger/striker stealing the ball and having nobody to stop him (especially if his tech is higher than pm)
defenders with low playmaker are terrible
In this ME, formidable playmaker is the minimum for top end defender.
9-10 can be decent on so many occasions, but once in a while they do something stupid.
Low playmaker = ball taken away from the defender, although he is high in technique.
defenders with low playmaker are terrible
In this ME, formidable playmaker is the minimum for top end defender.
9-10 can be decent on so many occasions, but once in a while they do something stupid.
Low playmaker = ball taken away from the defender, although he is high in technique.
Fix the form
+1
no player should keep bad form for a whole season or more
FIX THE FORM.
It's awful.
+1
no player should keep bad form for a whole season or more
FIX THE FORM.
It's awful.
a 30-year-old player doesn't drop performance and skills
Reducing of skills should start at 32, with the better players lasting a little longer and the worst falling faster.
Reducing of skills should start at 32, with the better players lasting a little longer and the worst falling faster.
In italian forum we noticed that removing 1 on 3 assistant coaches can result in a better training efficiency % in the new page.
What is the explaination?
-the new page shows only an "arithmetic average" of the 3 assistants, but for their job is better having 3 than 1
-the new page shows the real amount of training given by all assistants, so only 1 can do better than 3
we need to know!
What is the explaination?
-the new page shows only an "arithmetic average" of the 3 assistants, but for their job is better having 3 than 1
-the new page shows the real amount of training given by all assistants, so only 1 can do better than 3
we need to know!
not what you see is the average of what you have
it is not known if this means that there is better efficiency
rather worse
it is not known if this means that there is better efficiency
rather worse
My dear friend you must realise that something going wrong don't you think?With that way that you are going users will be not more than 4000 at July of 2023 remember that
(edited)
(edited)