Subject: [NT]Injuries - new voting

Obviously we are not getting any of the promised "extras" in nearest years, so we have a very simple choice.

We can have:

a. NTs without injuries and without training
b. NTs with injuries and with training

Please vote.

Obviously no injuries and no training.
This way NT's will be fun for me.

definitely training and injuries, more challenging and interesting for the gameplay

What is "challenging and interesting for the gameplay" in getting players injured?

This poll is ridiculous too..
Injuries are part of the game but I want them in proper length and frequency..
Or count only for NT as cards

They are not changing the length/frequency of injuries and it is not a topic about this.

This is a simple topic: do you want injuries and training or no injuries and no training.

Well none of them...

Check how many NT teams do not bother to play friendly anymore it's clear sign

What is "challenging and interesting for the gameplay" in getting players injured?

this is a good moment to say "no risk no fun"

i dont need nt training. its enough for me one league game %96 training.
Just no injury pls

There is usually no fun for owners because they don't care about NT Panama or NT Suomi and their results.

and this "risk"? What is the risk for the NT coach? He doesn't risk anything, he just has fun with other users' players.

So I will reverse it for you - no fun, a lot of risk = no player skills for NT coach

Check how many NT teams do not bother to play friendly anymore it's clear sign

clear sign of what, that they are lazy?

Check how many NT teams do not bother to play friendly anymore it's clear sign

You cannot get injuries in friendlies. They do that to keep their ranking/pot seed for WCQ
(edited)

I know the poll is pretty equal, but looking at this from a purely logical perspective, if you want to actually have the BEST players playing on the NT, then the obvious conclusion is to make all of these games arcade/no training.

I don't really follow the whole "yes I want training". When one league match gives you 96% what more do you really have to gain from the injury risk?
If you have an NT caliber player, the last thing you'll want is for him to get hurt away from your service.

I'm just not seeing the logical counter-argument for keeping things as they are. Especially for smaller countries with a limited pool of players.

edit: this is not addressed to mangol. Just a reply to the population here.
(edited)

Some NT coaches said that they need the NT training because otherwise nobody will train weak/average players from small countries

But that's also not logical because players don't play in u21 NT until they are 20-21yo anyway... so someone has to train them at 16, 17, 18 and 19yo by themselves, without NT bonus

The only hard part in training players is when they are 16-20... and these are the ages when they don't get the NT training, at 21 nobody needs it so I seriously don't get the need for NT training as well

Same with senior NT - who needs that training?? Those players already play in league games and get max training from them, it's ridiculous...

A friendly is 85% training, that is why, for that extra 15% to 100%.
In a lot of countries you cant train youngsters in other games than a friendly to be on top.