Subject: [NT]Injuries - new voting

Do you want NT games with "arcade style"?

This is a little tricky...

I want to vote YES for Senior NT, BUT NO for U21 NT...

I think it worth the risk for the little guys (future cracks being train to the maximum)
But, for senior i prefer they get NO INjuries and no training. Most of them dont need it any more.

You forget that their motto is "no training without risk"

Well, then no training.

And as you see ~half the users don't want that

I never understood this point.
In the previous system, I recon that NT training was helpful, since you only had 2 games and with 1 game + an NT game, you would have 100% (or close to) training.
But now, you have 3 games and you can train up to 4 different skills per week.
Also, the restriction about ''last order overrules previous different orders'' has been removed.
people who are not able to train their youngsters properly, without the ''help'' of the U21 matches, need mentoring...

Training is not only thing gaining experience for players was probably main reason u27 games and low were played

So players in friendly NT matches gain experience?

u27 games (as well as u17-u20 in u21 NT or u23-u26 or B-Team etc. games in senior NT) were usually played to:

a. have some fun
b. using same players all time is boring
c. reward users who train the NT talents that don't play yet/often in NT
d. to avoid 1st team players getting injured before important games

etc.

a. have some fun - you cannot have fun with NT team you have responsibility
b. using same players all time is boring - again NT is not personal team to have fun with!
c. reward users who train the NT talents that don't play yet/often in NT - thats good point!
d. to avoid 1st team players getting injured before important games - that is still valid to avoid cards

in the past yes!

a. have some fun - you cannot have fun with NT team you have responsibility
b. using same players all time is boring - again NT is not personal team to have fun with!

it's fun for the community not for me... for me it was only more work to do. I always created many competitions where you could win plus / NT game for your player / creating tactics for NT game etc.

NT - Yes, I want no NT injuries and no training
U21 - No, I want NT training and injuries

I just want injuries, dont care about training, yes/no whatever option is ok for me, but injuries are obligatory

How do you stand to the idea to split the injuries for both NT and club team?

I think I would be against. I just want NTs to have some meaningful impact (positive or negative, but preferably the latter) on real game which obviously is managing users teams.

But then...what is the point of having NT's?

I guess, the same exact one as now.

I think that NT managers, as being relatively active users, make a lot of noise about what is, or is not, or should be included in the game, often forgot that national teams are just an addon to that game and first and the foremost standard league teams should be taken care of. And while doing that devs should also remember that there are NTs here as well, but they shouldn't put them on the first place.

That is not true NT is the only reason some managers are still in the game including me ...

You are right.
NT and U21 are very important for some countries and managers.
(edited)