Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: PRESSROOM tab development - ideas
But when a user with very good players and player of 15000k value gets injured and another user who have most their players firecrackers gets injured a player of 10- 100k value it is fair:))?
@ Alienomo: the option to send a player for specialized treatment for a specified sum
Mmm...
I think this would be to the disadvantage of those who don't have a lot of money in their cashes, while it would make those who are already very rich and certainly don't need further advantages immune to injury (they already have excessive economic advantages, now we give them sporting ones too?).
I think in game money should open opportunities to decrease injuries and I don't think it's unfair for teams with less money.
Those with more money are around for 10+ years without such options! So new users will be able to ''use'' that option faster, but not instantly, because of lack of money.
Thing is, Sokker is a manager game, which means that you need to manage the way you use your money in order for your team to get better, in a way you want to it. Thing is, you are free to manage your team the way you like. If you feel you need the use of ''doctors or physisists or whatever'' to decrease the length of an injury, then that option should be available for all, but it's the manager that needs to decide if his team is financially stable enough to use it.
Each add-on in the game which costs money will be unfair for new teams... But is it fair to only look at new teams?
It was proposed that new teams should have:
1) bigger starting capital
2) Better starting players
3) Better coaches
4) Bigger stadium
5) An interactive tutorial which earns new teams money by ''learning'' how the game works, by browsing and making decisions, like placing a player for sale, set up your team for a match, make a new tactic in tactic editor...
And with all these they still would have a disadvantage compaired to the bigger clubs, but isn't that the whole purpose of the game? To grow your team...?
Mmm...
I think this would be to the disadvantage of those who don't have a lot of money in their cashes, while it would make those who are already very rich and certainly don't need further advantages immune to injury (they already have excessive economic advantages, now we give them sporting ones too?).
I think in game money should open opportunities to decrease injuries and I don't think it's unfair for teams with less money.
Those with more money are around for 10+ years without such options! So new users will be able to ''use'' that option faster, but not instantly, because of lack of money.
Thing is, Sokker is a manager game, which means that you need to manage the way you use your money in order for your team to get better, in a way you want to it. Thing is, you are free to manage your team the way you like. If you feel you need the use of ''doctors or physisists or whatever'' to decrease the length of an injury, then that option should be available for all, but it's the manager that needs to decide if his team is financially stable enough to use it.
Each add-on in the game which costs money will be unfair for new teams... But is it fair to only look at new teams?
It was proposed that new teams should have:
1) bigger starting capital
2) Better starting players
3) Better coaches
4) Bigger stadium
5) An interactive tutorial which earns new teams money by ''learning'' how the game works, by browsing and making decisions, like placing a player for sale, set up your team for a match, make a new tactic in tactic editor...
And with all these they still would have a disadvantage compaired to the bigger clubs, but isn't that the whole purpose of the game? To grow your team...?
In the end, what's the point of the plus?
if you don't want to include this new setting for those who have the plus
if you don't want to include this new setting for those who have the plus
if you get a ex-player into observed players, you will get a notification, so from my perspective that kind of news is already implemented.
It is better than all ex-players, less spam, only those who are interesting for you.
It is better than all ex-players, less spam, only those who are interesting for you.
well, i think it can be linked to player wage for example.
in that case better teams would pay more for top stars, but also benefit will be higher (shorter treatment of some true star)
in that case better teams would pay more for top stars, but also benefit will be higher (shorter treatment of some true star)
well, i think it can be linked to player wage for example.
That's actually not a bad idea. However, the ''benefit for top stars will be higher'' is not the right way.
Young players need to heal quicker than older players. It's only natural.
So maybe you can link it to age...
Keep the price the same for all, but the injury duration for young people shorthening faster.
In the end, most users are annoyed with trainees being injured, much more than with A-team players.
That's actually not a bad idea. However, the ''benefit for top stars will be higher'' is not the right way.
Young players need to heal quicker than older players. It's only natural.
So maybe you can link it to age...
Keep the price the same for all, but the injury duration for young people shorthening faster.
In the end, most users are annoyed with trainees being injured, much more than with A-team players.
Proposals
Cost of shortening injury time linked to:
- the player's value (not wage)
- the expected injury time
Efficiency of shortening injury time linked to:
- the player's age
- the medical staff level
Perhaps we could also add the causes of injuries and, depending on the type of injury, the medical staff may act more or less decisively or not at all.
Cost of shortening injury time linked to:
- the player's value (not wage)
- the expected injury time
Efficiency of shortening injury time linked to:
- the player's age
- the medical staff level
Perhaps we could also add the causes of injuries and, depending on the type of injury, the medical staff may act more or less decisively or not at all.
However, if the medical staff is introduced, injuries (and with them additional training minutes) in NT friendlies must also be reintroduced.
I've never been in favour of removing them (because it's unrealistic and because it penalises the smaller NT) and now, all the more so, that choice would make no sense.
I've never been in favour of removing them (because it's unrealistic and because it penalises the smaller NT) and now, all the more so, that choice would make no sense.
Each add-on in the game which costs money will be unfair for new teams... But is it fair to only look at new teams?
I wasn't referring to new users at all, but to those managers who have not made a lot of money from wild trading in the past, and I was comparing them with those who have gotten rich this way so far.
It was proposed that new teams should have:
1) bigger starting capital
2) Better starting players
3) Better coaches
4) Bigger stadium
5) An interactive tutorial which earns new teams money by ''learning'' how the game works, by browsing and making decisions, like placing a player for sale, set up your team for a match, make a new tactic in tactic editor...
Not me.
:D
And with all these they still would have a disadvantage compaired to the bigger clubs, but isn't that the whole purpose of the game? To grow your team...?
I totally agree with you.
;-)
I wasn't referring to new users at all, but to those managers who have not made a lot of money from wild trading in the past, and I was comparing them with those who have gotten rich this way so far.
It was proposed that new teams should have:
1) bigger starting capital
2) Better starting players
3) Better coaches
4) Bigger stadium
5) An interactive tutorial which earns new teams money by ''learning'' how the game works, by browsing and making decisions, like placing a player for sale, set up your team for a match, make a new tactic in tactic editor...
Not me.
:D
And with all these they still would have a disadvantage compaired to the bigger clubs, but isn't that the whole purpose of the game? To grow your team...?
I totally agree with you.
;-)
if it already isn’t, all the important matches like World Cup finals matches, Champions Cup finals etc. could be posted on all of the managers’ pressroom, and a statistics could be added to matches like “manager spectators” that would create something exciting and entice people to watch more games. it would create another achievement for managers to advertise themselves on the pressroom to become the most watched team or something.
it can be explored, but my idea is to bring community together more and have the managers get more recognition for their achievements.
it can be explored, but my idea is to bring community together more and have the managers get more recognition for their achievements.
Today injuries for older players aren't shown correctly, i mean when a 30+ yo players receives 16 days injury he will cure in about 20-22 days.
It was promised a year ago that it will be fixed... still no fixes... and it's very strange to read about medical staff and faster treatment.
It was promised a year ago that it will be fixed... still no fixes... and it's very strange to read about medical staff and faster treatment.
Raul, I want to tell you about the complaints of many users. Could there be an injury update first and then a training update on Thursday? In this way, slightly injured players can recover and train for 7 days. It is better to do some things for the benefit of the users.