Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: [idea] New conditional order to be proposed
- 1
- 2
ringhio to
All
Hi all, dear devs
I have in mind a new conditional order to propose. It's "if the player is on the bench".
it should work like this in the conditional orders page
#minute - "if the player is on the bench"
<name of the player to check if it's on the bench> <n° position to enter to play>
The order checks if the player is on the bench and, if yes, it will make the player enter in the field to play in the position specified.
This could be useful if a player is not entered in the field for some previous conditions that didn't happened.
I have in mind a new conditional order to propose. It's "if the player is on the bench".
it should work like this in the conditional orders page
#minute - "if the player is on the bench"
<name of the player to check if it's on the bench> <n° position to enter to play>
The order checks if the player is on the bench and, if yes, it will make the player enter in the field to play in the position specified.
This could be useful if a player is not entered in the field for some previous conditions that didn't happened.
Speaking of orders, it wouldn't be interesting if you could say, Player X enters instead of player Y if we are winning, FROM SUCH minute
I understand that today if you put that order and for example minute 60, it is only given if that condition is met at minute 60, if at minute 62 that condition is met it no longer happens. That quite limits the possibility of making changes in different scenarios.
I understand that today if you put that order and for example minute 60, it is only given if that condition is met at minute 60, if at minute 62 that condition is met it no longer happens. That quite limits the possibility of making changes in different scenarios.
sure, an option “starting from this time” (like a checkbox) should be interesting for all kind of orders.
(edited)
(edited)
If nothing else, to make it more obvious to newer users, because it's not at all obvious. I didn't know when I started.
yes! That's a must imo! Actually, the orders should have 3 timing options.
From, Until and At
From...starting from a certain minute till the end...
Until...starting from the start until a certain minute
At...as it is now...at an exact minute
I don't really think it's that hard to implement and it gives the orders a much larger range in which they can be executed!
(edited)
From, Until and At
From...starting from a certain minute till the end...
Until...starting from the start until a certain minute
At...as it is now...at an exact minute
I don't really think it's that hard to implement and it gives the orders a much larger range in which they can be executed!
(edited)
You van use the "always" order on a certain minute for that.
No It's different, because I just want that this substitution happens if a player is in the bench, I mean, if some earlier condition didn't happened. If I do the "always" order and a earlier condition happened, it will be a mess!
Speaking like a computer programmer, you can see it like the "default" case of a switch-case structure. I put this example, player X is in the bench
minute 45 if i'm losing
put player X in position 10 and I change tactic
minute 60 if I'm losing or draw result
put player X in position 10 and I change tactic
minute 70 if the player is in the bench
put player X in position 11
If I'm losing at minute 45 and the player enter, I change tactic and it works going to win, the order at minute 70 can create a mess if I use the conditional order "always" or "if I'm winning".
No It's different, because I just want that this substitution happens if a player is in the bench, I mean, if some earlier condition didn't happened. If I do the "always" order and a earlier condition happened, it will be a mess!
Speaking like a computer programmer, you can see it like the "default" case of a switch-case structure. I put this example, player X is in the bench
minute 45 if i'm losing
put player X in position 10 and I change tactic
minute 60 if I'm losing or draw result
put player X in position 10 and I change tactic
minute 70 if the player is in the bench
put player X in position 11
If I'm losing at minute 45 and the player enter, I change tactic and it works going to win, the order at minute 70 can create a mess if I use the conditional order "always" or "if I'm winning".
X player kicks the corner.
X Player makes all "laterales" (i dont know how it translate)
Those are BASICS since the game beggins
X Player makes all "laterales" (i dont know how it translate)
Those are BASICS since the game beggins
you can make more:
x players get the RIGHT corner
x players get the LEFT corner
X Player makes all "laterales por izquierda"
X Player makes all "lateralespor la derecha"
x players get the RIGHT corner
x players get the LEFT corner
X Player makes all "laterales por izquierda"
X Player makes all "lateralespor la derecha"
You van use the "always" order on a certain minute for that.
There is possibility that player is already on the pitch because he was subbed on instead of an injured player. In that case players would just switch their places, player that he wants to sub off would still be in game.
There is possibility that player is already on the pitch because he was subbed on instead of an injured player. In that case players would just switch their places, player that he wants to sub off would still be in game.
Free kick, (on our own side off the field) Including goalkeeper for off side to our favor.
corner kick.
Throw in.
That would be great!
corner kick.
Throw in.
That would be great!
- 1
- 2