Subject: Dev Update 69 on coaches

Absolutely, and I love the concept of allowing them to become coaches at 40. I know teams like to just keep around some of their favorite players at super low salaries. I might do the same thing.

In this way, once again the difficulty of the game is expressed in the team's present luck at the exact moment in which they decide to implement a change.
After 8 years playing (for the first time) I have everything invested in supernatural coaches + youth players (who obviously will not reach the goal)

I don't think the changes will hit new users, because how would they? The draw of an average coach will not change at all. And those who can afford it, instead of sitting with their old maximum coaches, will have to spend some money to rebuild the staff to the same level.

The other thing is that the new ones should be helped, but don't see the problem in reforming the coaches. Newcomers deserve a new approach and changes elsewhere.

This was not a five-minute decision. Every change has its advantages and disadvantages. It was important to find a middle ground and it took us a long time to adjust everything, paying attention to many things.

The problem lies with people who invested in coaches recently and bought or recruited old coaches. They will see their investments go up in smoke.
Also, teams with very old coaches overall, will have to buy or recruit new coaches, which will cost them millions! tens of millions if they want to have a staff like they used to have. I don't think they will just accept that. And why would they. It's just unfair. The change itself is good, but a one time age drawback is imo mandatory!