Azərbaycan dili Bahasa Indonesia Bosanski Català Čeština Dansk Deutsch Eesti English Español Français Galego Hrvatski Italiano Latviešu Lietuvių Magyar Malti Mакедонски Nederlands Norsk Polski Português Português BR Românã Slovenčina Srpski Suomi Svenska Tiếng Việt Türkçe Ελληνικά Български Русский Українська Հայերեն ქართული ენა 中文
Subpage under development, new version coming soon!

Subject: [idea] Proposal

  • 1
  • 2
2024-10-15 20:28:54
H. Romeu to All
Very simple. To solve some problems.

Create a button in the players page. Accept YES or NoT Proposals for that player. If this is turned YES. Other players can make a proposal. It can be accepted ot rejected. If accepted, it automatically turns into an standard auction with that value as initial bid
2024-10-15 20:33:26
and, worth adding, also with that value as starting value, not only initial bid, so the 2.5% tax will be taken from it
2024-10-15 20:47:59
Yep, trigger bids. No more relisting every 48 hours. This is my price, the player is available when you're ready to pay it.
2024-10-15 21:00:35
in many football managers there are now contracts. why not add this setting?
2024-10-15 21:20:12
I don't think you want to add complications just for the sake of it when the annoyance outweighs the benefit. Player contracts are technically changed every season with wage calculations anyway.
2024-10-15 21:23:02
free players with money directly into the game
2024-10-16 00:32:04
This is a great idea. There are transfer ads now, but no one really looks at those, I don't think. It also can't start an auction.

No more promising to pay X, and then not doing so.
2024-10-19 03:47:24
Yes. Translation problem. The offer accepted would be the starting bided value. Very simple.
2024-10-31 00:28:00
Yes, your idea is very good, but there we can't see the player's skills when the player is not registered on the transfer list. If we want that, we have to be able to see the player's skills so it's not like "buying a cat in a sack".
2024-11-02 03:39:08
As I sugested a "button" to accept or not proposals (offers from other users). If it's turned YES, the onwer accept offers from other users for that player, it's implyied that he is able to sell him, so his habilities can be seen.
(edited)
2024-11-05 03:05:21
It's the same as now, there are no significant changes, just adding an accept or not button. :-)
2024-11-05 09:43:39
your idea should change the announcement idea - it is much more logical and I love it.
now if you find the player you are looking for, i can typically write what happens within several hours timeline:

A: "Hi, I am interested in your player X, how much you want for him?"
B: "Hello fornado, I don't know, how much you pay?"
A: "I can pay 10 mill"
B: "Oh it is too low sorry"

I just stopped writing, usually nobody knows how much they want, but they know it is too small amount.
You are selling, just f***ing put the price on what you sell!
2024-11-05 11:34:11
„You are buying, just give f*** offer”
2024-11-05 11:37:22
if you're not selling nor buying, get the f*** out of here!
2024-11-05 19:49:38
A: "I can pay 10 mill"

Seems like an offer to me...
2024-11-05 20:31:43
And "not enough" is an answer

What he expects is to hear the price up front, because his issue, as he pointed out, is that it takes many hours to discuss ("what happens within several hours timeline:")

He can also give an offer up front

1. A: "Hi, I am interested in your player X, how much you want for him?"
2. B: "Hello fornado, I don't know, how much you pay?"
3. A: "I can pay 10 mill"
4. B: "Oh it is too low sorry"

so the 10m offer would be in point 1. not point 3., thus making the conversation shorter.

1. Hi I want to buy this player, I offer 10m
2. Hi, yes/no

Facts are that some people don't know the worth of their player and some just "go fishing" hoping that the buyer will present a higher offer than they would ask for

But yes, I would also like redone Transfer Announcements with one of those options

a. fixed price - someone agrees to pay = players goes on TL automatically
b. buyer send an offer / seller can accept it

It would need some kind of new taxes though, because it would be used as a workaround for the "set price" transfer tax
(edited)
  • 1
  • 2